theme: cerejadosundae; details: +.
Don't copy.
/ Next



…but, more importantly, we also carry the key to free ourselves.

…but, more importantly, we also carry the key to free ourselves.

(Fonte: sillyenfp)


10/08/2014 às 12:08pm · 208 notas

 


10/08/2014 às 12:05pm · 81 notas

"I learned the hard way that I cannot always count on others to respect my feelings - even if I respect theirs. Being a good person doesn’t guarantee that others will be good people. You only have control over yourself and how you choose to be as a person. As for others, you can only choose to accept them or walk away."

— I Love Quotes

(Fonte: onlinecounsellingcollege)


10/08/2014 às 12:04pm · 8.897 notas



10/08/2014 às 12:01pm · 456 notas



10/08/2014 às 12:01pm · 85 notas


(Fonte: jsounthone, via lunors)


10/08/2014 às 12:00pm · 477.747 notas


(Fonte: vinstage, via vinstage)


10/08/2014 às 11:56am · 53.453 notas


(Fonte: the-mariarita)


10/08/2014 às 11:56am · 1.218 notas



10/08/2014 às 11:55am · 29 notas


The Science Behind Intuition
Scientists have discovered that humans appear to have two, very different “operating systems.”  System 1 is our quick, instinctual, and often subconscious way of operating – it is controlled by our right brain and by other parts of our brain that have been around since prehistoric times, known as the “limbic” and reptilian” parts of our brain.  System 2 is our slower, more analytical, and conscious way of operating – it is controlled by our left brain and by newer parts of our brain that have only developed since prehistoric times (also known as the “neocortex”).  Researchers have found that intuition is part of System 1, which is why it comes on so rapidly and often does not make rational sense to us.  In other words, intuitive decisions are not something that we have thought out carefully with reason, but rather choices that have arisen quickly out of instinct.
But why, exactly, should we trust our gut instinct?  One reason would be because researchers have found that System 1 often knows the right answer long before System 2 does.  For example, in one study, researchers asked their subjects to play a card game where the goal was to win the most money.  What the subjects did not realize, however, is that the game was rigged from the start.  There were two stacks of cards to choose from; one was rigged to provide big wins followed by big losses, while the other deck was set up to provide small gains but almost no losses.  
It took about 50 cards before the subjects said they had a hunch about which deck was safer, and about 80 cards before they could actually explain the difference between the two decks.  However, what is most fascinating is that after only 10 cards the sweat glands on the subjects’ palms opened slightly every time they reached for a card in the dangerous deck.  It was also around the tenth card that the subjects started to favor the safer deck, without being consciously aware that they were doing so.  In other words, long before the analytical brain could explain what was going on, the subjects’ bodily intuition knew where there was danger, and guided them toward safety.
A similar study looked at people’s ability to predict whether a picture was behind Curtain #1 or Curtain #2; however, this was done on a computer, so there were no actual curtains involved.  Just like with the card study, the researchers also measured the subjects’ subtle physiological responses.  Remarkably, they found that the subjects’ bodies were able to predict the correct curtain 2-3 seconds before the computer had even decided which curtain to use.
 The subjects did not always follow through with what their slightly sweaty palms were telling them to do, but the slightly sweaty palms were almost always right – in fact, they even had the ability to predict the future (by about 2-3 seconds).  For gamblers who would like to have the ability to predict what’s behind a certain card, this study suggests that they should work on heightening their sense of intuition to such a degree that they can recognize when the sweat glands on their palms have opened up.  
Finally, other studies have found that, when it comes to making major life decisions, such as which house to buy or which person to marry, trusting your intuition leads to better outcomes than trusting your logical, thinking brain.  In one such study, car buyers who had plenty of time to pour over all of the information about their various car choices were later found to be satisfied with their purchase only 25% of the time.  Meanwhile, those buyers who made a quick, intuitive decision about their car purchase were found to be satisfied with their purchase 60% of the time.

The Science Behind Intuition

Scientists have discovered that humans appear to have two, very different “operating systems.”  System 1 is our quick, instinctual, and often subconscious way of operating – it is controlled by our right brain and by other parts of our brain that have been around since prehistoric times, known as the “limbic” and reptilian” parts of our brain.  System 2 is our slower, more analytical, and conscious way of operating – it is controlled by our left brain and by newer parts of our brain that have only developed since prehistoric times (also known as the “neocortex”).  Researchers have found that intuition is part of System 1, which is why it comes on so rapidly and often does not make rational sense to us.  In other words, intuitive decisions are not something that we have thought out carefully with reason, but rather choices that have arisen quickly out of instinct.

But whyexactly, should we trust our gut instinct?  One reason would be because researchers have found that System 1 often knows the right answer long before System 2 does.  For example, in one study, researchers asked their subjects to play a card game where the goal was to win the most money.  What the subjects did not realize, however, is that the game was rigged from the start.  There were two stacks of cards to choose from; one was rigged to provide big wins followed by big losses, while the other deck was set up to provide small gains but almost no losses.  

It took about 50 cards before the subjects said they had a hunch about which deck was safer, and about 80 cards before they could actually explain the difference between the two decks.  However, what is most fascinating is that after only 10 cards the sweat glands on the subjects’ palms opened slightly every time they reached for a card in the dangerous deck.  It was also around the tenth card that the subjects started to favor the safer deck, without being consciously aware that they were doing so.  In other words, long before the analytical brain could explain what was going on, the subjects’ bodily intuition knew where there was danger, and guided them toward safety.

A similar study looked at people’s ability to predict whether a picture was behind Curtain #1 or Curtain #2; however, this was done on a computer, so there were no actual curtains involved.  Just like with the card study, the researchers also measured the subjects’ subtle physiological responses.  Remarkably, they found that the subjects’ bodies were able to predict the correct curtain 2-3 seconds before the computer had even decided which curtain to use.

 The subjects did not always follow through with what their slightly sweaty palms were telling them to do, but the slightly sweaty palms were almost always right – in fact, they even had the ability to predict the future (by about 2-3 seconds).  For gamblers who would like to have the ability to predict what’s behind a certain card, this study suggests that they should work on heightening their sense of intuition to such a degree that they can recognize when the sweat glands on their palms have opened up.  

Finally, other studies have found that, when it comes to making major life decisions, such as which house to buy or which person to marry, trusting your intuition leads to better outcomes than trusting your logical, thinking brain.  In one such study, car buyers who had plenty of time to pour over all of the information about their various car choices were later found to be satisfied with their purchase only 25% of the time.  Meanwhile, those buyers who made a quick, intuitive decision about their car purchase were found to be satisfied with their purchase 60% of the time.

(Fonte: neuromorphogenesis)


10/08/2014 às 11:54am · 676 notas



9/06/2014 às 8:38pm · 1.422 notas


(Fonte: red-lipstick, via lunors)


9/06/2014 às 8:32pm · 37.524 notas


(Fonte: egorshapovalov, via lunors)


9/06/2014 às 8:31pm · 143.978 notas


(Fonte: vscograam, via vscograam)


9/06/2014 às 8:30pm · 138 notas


(Fonte: bunnyjennyphotos, via lunors)


9/06/2014 às 8:26pm · 464.034 notas